[theptip]

You seem to be asserting that the only options are “public square” (eligible for section 230 protection) or “publisher”.

It’s not clear to me that section 230 has anything to do with public squares, can you elaborate on your position? Why can’t they be neither a publisher nor a public square?

I’m by no means an expert on this bit of legislation; Wikipedia just says:

> No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.