[ddevault]

Lines of code is a poor approximation for complexity. Rust programs are shorter, but they are not less complex. The AST is similar and the graph of relationships between different parts of the code is much more complex than in C. Overall I'd say it balances at best, if not that Rust is more complex.

[roca]

The sudo code in question is typical C: string processing with pointers and hand-rolled byte manipulation, size calculations, manual buffer allocation and freeing, and so on. The Rust equivalents of all this are far simpler.

[swsieber]

Lines of code is great approximation for complexity, or at least how many bugs you're writing: https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/1856...

[ddevault]

Perhaps indeed! But a crucial distinction is that I consider the complexity in the langauge, compiler, and standard library to all be influences on your program's total complexity as well. Using std::List (or whatever you call it) has the same total complexity as writing your own little growable array.

[roca]

From the point of view of bugginess, complexity in the implementations of massively popular libraries is far less of an issue than code you just wrote yourself, because the code in those libraries will have received much more testing than the code you just wrote yourself. So it doesn't really make sense to just add the complexity of components up like that.

[joveian]

sudo is quite a popular utility, by the same logic it might be expected to be well tested...

[swsieber]

Yes. And I shudder to think just how many bugs there would be in a home-grown sudo replacement.