[luxuryballs]

You can look up each case and see what the rulings were, in some cases the lawsuits were dismissed before evidence could be presented. I have seen other people claim this and get buried which confuses me, is it just not ok to talk about the idea that there was election fraud which has been noticed but not confirmed? It should be OK to talk about this, especially in a democracy.

[enkid]

You provided a long list of claims. I asked for evidence of one and an explanation for why the legal system hasn't done anything with this evidence since it has been massively litigated. The burden of proof is in you to prove your claims. You can't just say "fraud" and not provide evidence then hide behind diversity of ideas. It is damaging to the stability of the US to claim fraud. What you say has consequences. So either put up or shutbup.

[Haunted_Cabbage]

Noticed? Doesn't one need evidence to notice something or does imagination suffice?

[jb775]

Exactly.

Everyone seems to agree that diversity is a good thing that leads to better overall outcomes, but then some of those people think that doesn't apply to diversity of ideas. Much of America's success can be attributed to being a melting pot of all types of people, and the mix of ideas they brought to the table. This recent trend of extreme censorship and "cancel culture" is bad for everyone long term, even if you agree with it in the short term.

[enkid]

Asking for evidence to claims of fraud is "cancel culture" or shutting down diversity of ideas? That makes no sense.