Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by cestith 1975 days ago
If they are intentionally causing confusion it seems their right to recover would be seriously limited by their failure to mitigate damages.
1 comments

I’d not say “intentionally” as I don’t think that this was the motivation behind the change. I’d consider it “knowingly” - they were or at least should have been aware that the change was going to create confusion about the license that individual code parts and changes were under. It was pointed out at that time.