|
|
|
|
|
by Kim_Bruning
1969 days ago
|
|
Living on the border of two such western countries, I'd like to point out that they are definitely taking measures (currently lockdowns) to keep things under control, the lockdowns have a very measurable effect on R, and the death rate in both countries is something like 1-2 orders of magnitude less than the USA. Basically you're trying to control R. As long as you keep R under 1, you can increase and reduce measures to keep the disease under control. If R goes too far over 1, you bleeped up, and you need to resort to a lockdown to get it back under control. The theory a lot of (european) western countries are working on is that they want to allow as much freedom as possible, but keep the worst of the disease out. I'm not entirely convinced this is actually the strategy that optimizes freedom though. It might be better to use the method some asian countries used: close the borders, do maximum effort lockdowns anytime the virus shows up at all; and you might have less days total in lockdown or restrictions, and more days where you are free to go out and eat indoors etc. |
|
The naïveté on display here is staggering. "You can vote your way into fascism, but you have to shoot your way out."