[zenorogue]

Usually "non-Euclidean" is used for Riemannian manifolds, so if something is not a Riemannian manifold, it is not called Euclidean or non-Euclidean.

Just like "irrational number", which is not any number that is not rational -- we still assume that it is a real number, so i or Aleph-Null are not considered irrational.

If we include teleport points in our metric, we no longer have a manifold (if teleports are one-way, not even a metric space). Similarly for Mountain Valley, or affine/projective manifolds that can be found in some games, it is wrong to call them Euclidean or non-Euclidean.

Anyway, originally "non-Euclidean" was just the hyperbolic plane (the only geometric structure which satisfies all the Euclid's axioms except the fifth), and then (depending on whom you ask) it was extended to also mean other situations which are different but similar in nature -- so spherical geometry (which is just the opposite), Nil/Solv geometry (which also play with parallel lines), but not cylinders, affine manifolds, teleports, taxicab metric, and so on (they don't really do anything interesting to parallel lines).

[nine_k]

Thanks, that's informative!

Games on "spherical", or rather, "polar" surfaces are well-known: space flight around a gravitating body, along circular geodesics.

A shooter in a hyperbolic space, and with gravity, could be hilarious.

[zenorogue]

Unfortunately spherical geometry is often done incorrectly (in Civilization the Earth was a cylinder, in other games planets are tori).

What kind of shooter? An Asteroids-like game on hyperbolic manifolds (both 2D and 3D) can be found in HyperRogue, although there is no gravity. Gravity in hyperbolic space is a rather problematic thing, you always get some extremely weird effects, also I believe there are no stable orbits in hyperbolic spaces.