|
|
|
|
|
by metageek
5498 days ago
|
|
There are more details in the interview tzs linked to [1]. >It was as though he thought his interpretation of policy superseded the authority of the people or office who/which set out the policy. It's worse than that. According to the juror in the interview, there was no policy on who could get the passwords. So it wasn't a matter of interpretation; it was purely pulled out of his posterior data storage unit. [1] http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2588689 |
|