Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Judgmentality 1979 days ago
You make a SPAC sound even shadier than a reverse merger.
2 comments

It's more an indication of how (irrationally) intent companies are on staying private well into their days as a global empire.
Why is it irrational to stay private? Going public constrains you with oversight and public shareholder demands.

If you can get access to capital without public shareholders, you absolutely should.

It seems like the only rational reasons to IPO are out of necessity (you need to raise the money, your employees will quit without liquidation, etcetera), or short-term greed. What other reason would you want to be public?
To me it sounds like all cards are on the table, as opposed to reverse mergers.