Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sgt 1977 days ago
It would have taken considerable effort, regardless. This cost was offset onto the development teams in companies doing migrations. It was the decision made and if you don't like it, consider using another programming language. Perhaps consider that it's an open source project with a lot of contributors essentially working for free.
1 comments

This explanation can be used to justify anyone breaking anything. You might as well argue no project ever needs to care about backwards compatibility.
How many downstream, Python dependent companies were funding its development? Everyone is entitled to their opinion. But if they build their system on a platform outside their control then they'll have to roll with the changes, fork it, or move to a different platform / fork.