|
|
|
|
|
|
by avereveard
1981 days ago
|
|
|
ah, I dabbled in a same idea, but before "guardians" I had another step, which was contacting the "vault" owner after "keyholder" requests and before "guardians" approval allowing for the owner to veto access if needed be, as another layer of authorization. glad to see things like these are cropping up, there's a need for sure. |
|
|