At risk of being pedantic, technically it's device-mapper/dm-crypt that's doing the heavy lifting here... but I guess LUKS has become the popular name for the whole pile due to its visibility.
And the cryptsetup tools / kernel has recently added support for Windows Bitlocker encryption as an alternative to LUKS, obviously only really appropriate if you deal with Windows images or need interop with Windows.
And the cryptsetup tools / kernel has recently added support for Windows Bitlocker encryption as an alternative to LUKS, obviously only really appropriate if you deal with Windows images or need interop with Windows.