|
|
|
|
|
by TheOtherHobbes
1978 days ago
|
|
This is missing the point. We might be interested in ants, but the ants would not be interested in us, because ants cannot understand us. We can prod and research ant hills all we want. But all ants will ever see are some unexpected occurrences - maybe a very unusual scent which they can't place, or some food which wasn't there earlier, or an unexpected plague of ant death - which they will forget almost instantly. It will never occur to ant-kind that they're even being studied, because ants have no concept of what "being studied" means. There is nothing at all in the ant (hill) mind capable of understanding that a creature like a human might exist, never mind how to communicate with it. So we can do what we like, and we will remain not just invisible, but unthinkable - forever. |
|
Still, as a society, we have a number of dedicated individuals that do study celestial movements and would try and prevent a sudden asteroid impact, and we all do remain vaguely aware of what's going on up there. So I'm not certain how much I agree with the fact that ants cannot understand us. Sure we can't sit down and have tea with an ant and talk about the weather, but if the moon was a gigantic dragon that just moved really slowly in a mostly predictable manner then how we interact with it might not be particularly distinguishable from how we interact with it when it's just a chunk of rock.
A good parallel to think of here is probably Discworld, I might suggest reading The Light Fantastic if you never had to get a bit of a sense of how we might interact with celestially sized lifeforms and just how one-sided that relationship could potentially be.