Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Conan_Kudo 1968 days ago
> RHEL has a strict demarcation between support levels, features, release timelines, etc. So if you report a bug to RHEL, they may not backport the fix even if it fixed upstream. And then you are just stuck.

This is changing with CentOS Stream. Bugs can be filed against CentOS Stream in the Red Hat Bugzilla and they will do something with that bug report. Additionally, if you know what to backport to fix it, you can submit pull requests on any package in CentOS Stream to have it reviewed and merged to fix your issue. The fix would then be built and released within days of merging your fix.

From my perspective, that's pretty golden for an Enterprise Linux platform. The only other that's like that is openSUSE Leap/SUSE Linux Enterprise.
1 comments
bubblethink 1968 days ago
Stream is a bit closer than Fedora, but the larger point of needing paid support remains. The slow cadence of RHEL means that unless you are paying for support, things get kind of frozen around the .5 release. After that, they just won't backport fixes, not even regressions, unless a) You are paying, b) It's really a critical security bug. I don't think that will change with Stream.

To summarize, the RHEL model of releasing an OS every 5 years with these staggered upstreams is really not that great. It creates immense inertia and pain down the road. RedHat itself hasn't been able to port its own offerings like Satellite to RHEL 8. I would rather have the Ubuntu cadence of LTS releases every 2 years so that you are at most 2 years away from any fixes you need.

link
Conan_Kudo 1968 days ago
RHEL major releases are every 3 years now.

Matthew Miller (@mattdm) tweeted out the "Fedora->RHEL formula": https://twitter.com/mattdm/status/1349037318200561665

link