|
|
|
|
|
|
by apple_innocent
1981 days ago
|
|
|
"The US government is concerned that an attempt, through legislation, to regulate the competitive positions of specific players in a fast-evolving digital market, to the clear detriment of two US firms, may result in harmful outcomes." - US trade representatives Daniel Bahar and Karl Ehlers Competitive. Competition. In Australia. Who "competes" with these "specific players". No other websites even come close. This is a sad display of US financial leverage in favour of two companies that need no such help. If anything they need to be reigned in as they decimate foreign media. Trump must have some grudge against Australia to allow this pressure. |
|
|
How does directing traffic to a media site "decimate" it?
If such is detrimental, then Australian authorities should be happy to see it stop, no? They are not.
https://news.trust.org/item/20210114053955-8glv8
It's decimating but they don't want it to stop? What?!?
Basically, they just tipped their hand. This shows that what we really have here is a sad display of an attempted and targeted shakedown of foreign entities by Australian government. Media impact is the best justification they could derive -- or were somehow influenced to derive.
By the way, I am no fan of either Scroogle or Facecrook. But the idea that they are collecting $ billions at the expense of Australian media content (aka Rupert Murdock) is absurd. If content theft was really the issue, existing laws could/would be applied to address it.