|
|
|
|
|
by jw14
1972 days ago
|
|
It should be pretty easy to tell what ratio of hits had JS disabled. If it’s more than a tiny minority, I’d do something. I have plenty of things to talk to users about without getting them into whatever this is (still deciding if I class this as paranoia or being cautious or some kind of elitism). Based on the level of vitriol, looks like one of the outer 2 so far. If you want to persuade developers to do things differently, bad mouthing their tech choices is a really bad strategy. |
|
You can't expect normal people to browse with JS disabled, because by definition of "normal" they have not enough technical knowledge to do it, and to deal with the issues it causes on the modern web.
> I have plenty of things to talk to users about without getting them into whatever this is
This is the real answer to the question, "why is my computer so slow"? Regular people still mostly think "it's viruses", but it's not viruses - just web developers making websites with no consideration of end-user performance.
> If you want to persuade developers to do things differently, bad mouthing their tech choices is a really bad strategy.
I think this is a viable (even if not most efficient) strategy, because the current standard practice came from praising these choices. Counterbalancing the cargo cult through pointing out the trade-offs being implicitly made is a good idea, IMO.