|
|
|
|
|
|
by tubbyjr
1986 days ago
|
|
|
I really feel the article's quality would greatly improve, focusing on just Ethereum 2.0, where fair points regarding its issues are brought up. Showing the node count for BTC and making it seem huge, while trying to sell the fact of how terrible it is to run a ETH node instead, and not mentioning the fact that there are actually more active ETH nodes online than BTC, is highly disengenious, and unfortunately just makes this seem like a bagholder trying to discredit competition. |
|
|