|
|
|
|
|
by jelliclesfarm
1987 days ago
|
|
Would building underground bunker homes be safer? With clay tile roofs? Also.. from 2016..Bush fire resistant homes: https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2016/feb/09... A while ago, YC was looking at New Cities. Projects like that should buy contiguous tracts like in paradise and rebuild safe terrain appropriate homes and rewild above ground. It’s cheap right now and it’s a blank slate..infrastructure is already in place. It can be negotiated so it can unincorporate itself so Sacramento doesn’t exert too much influence. Just a thought. A 100 acre area can be an actual self sustaining ‘village’. I want to say..anywhere between 250-600 people. Grazing animals above ground can be a good defense against wild fires as well as man made canals..there can also be above ground communal structures. |
|
Furthermore, she had to sell because my now ex-stepfather walked out on her suddenly because of her unexpected disability life event and forced them to sell. He's rich now after inheriting from his family and she gets a pittance less than Social Security when they planned to combine households and retire together permanently. Plus, there's nothing left around but a drug rehab halfway house, disgruntled, reclusive Trump supporters with guns, and some agro neighbors with psychosis. The odds of being robbed or violently attacked are pretty high, and there's black bear.