Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by davidivadavid 1979 days ago
Yup, people have been brainwashed into thinking "bubbles" are a problem when they've been the solution to that problem from the start.

I've suggested that idea a million time, it's all yours for the taking for those who want to implement it:

Build a social network where there is a per-user karma/reputation graph, with a recursive mechanism to propagate reputation (with decay): I like a post, that boosts the signal/reputation from whoever posted, and from people who liked it, and decreases signal from people who downvoted it.

There can be arbitrarily more sophisticated propagation algorithms to jumpstart new users by weighing their first few votes more highly and "absorb" existing user reputation graphs (some Bayesian updating of some kind).

Allow basic things like blocking/muting/etc with similar effects.

This alone would help people curate their information way more efficiently. There are people who post things I know for a fact I never want to read again. That's fine, let me create my own bubble.

The TrustNet/Freechains concepts seem adjacent and it's the first time I come across them — looks interesting.

1 comments

If it includes a recommendation system, then something to mix them up a bit so that people can see things that are different to what they have holed themselves into one view/subject by their own karma curation. The idea is that each recommendation has a chance to be anything, more likely something suggested by karma, but has the tiny chance to be the thing that karma suggests I least like. I like the idea of seeing a subject that I didn't know I was interested in or posts I would find objectionable some of the time.
Yeah, you could introduce a random element of serendipity where you sometimes push a bit further out of the graph to discover things out of your usual purview.