[sc00ter]

>That's a very good thing to hear.

It would be but for the distinction between "undisputedly" and "undisputably". All this says is that it hasn't been disputed, not that it can't be.

[sigzero]

I think Apple meant something very specific as any other reading doesn't make sense. They are saying it is "above dispute". Apple knows what they licensed.

[ars]

They aren't saying "above dispute", they are saying "has not been disputed" (and implying that it will not be disputed, but it could).