| > omg science You know, this infallible social institution which never pushed society towards cringeworthy ideas, which never revised previous theories (wiki has a whole article on superseded theories). And who said reproducibility crisis? It doesn't exist, science is perfect, ergo we know. Like when Swedes practised eugenics and sterilised innocent people, that was just a bad science, yeap. Hopefully today we have perfect science so this couldn't happen. Not to mention that science is not applicable to everything, most questionable questions are not scientific, hence I don't know who is arguing "in bad faith" by cherry-picking grotesque examples. > Your argument is in bad faith as you've either read none of the disinformation No, your arguments are completely orthogonal to what I said. You are saying that some people tell lies. I'm saying that there is no objective decision procedure which tells truth from lies. If you don't see the difference, it means you are too dumb for me to continue this argument "in bad faith". |