|
|
|
|
|
by lopuhin
1988 days ago
|
|
> I chose MobileNetV2 to make iteration faster. When I tried ResNet50 or other larger models the gap between the M1 and Nvidia grew wider. (and that's on CIFAR-10). But why not report these results and also test on a more realistic datasets? The internet is full of M1 TF brenchmarks on CIFAR or MNIST, has anyone seen something different? |
|
I wish ML used more than CIFNISTNet, but unfortunately there's not a lot of standard datasets yet. (Even Imagenet is an absolute pain to set up.)