|
|
|
|
|
by inglor_cz
1988 days ago
|
|
"because they simply fizzle out, like a fire that consumed all of the underbrush" That depends on consequences. For example, if there are jobs that depend on continuation of social phenomena, their holders will fight tooth and nail not to let this happen. Universities now have special administrators dedicated to diversity, equity and inclusion. These are someone's livelihoods and also sources of power. Will the incumbents simply say "there is no more interest in identity politics, our task is done, we made ourselves redundant"? No. As long as they are paid to promote, say, inclusion, they will always push the idea that more must be done. |
|
This isn't an empty argument, I'll grant. It extends to yellow "journalists" (from OANN to CTH), political campaign staff (divided country = more spending on politics), social media companies, and others. Division is profitable.
But lots of awful things are profitable. There are always stakeholders in whatever enterprise is polluting the water, the air, or the discourse. You deal with it by offering them progressively worse compromises and hoping that, over time, the frogs will jump out of the pot.