[three_seagrass]

Absence of evidence isn't evidence though. It could be that the CEO was also trained not to respond to questions that could be twisted around in an anti-trust allegation.

[xiphias2]

It was evidence from a Facebook whistle-blower with concrete pictures and concrete name of the project, not some random questions.

Of course the CEO's answer was all non-answers. Nobody was surprised of that.

Then Mark was asked personal questions and he was shocked...the same questions that he knows about everybody in the world.