|
|
|
|
|
by esarbe
1990 days ago
|
|
No, not acually. Generics in Go are vastly different than templates in C++. They might be used for similar things, but whereas Go's generics actually build up on Go's structural typing, templates are ... something completely different again. I mean; C++ templates are Turing complete. They are in the same ballpark as Scala's type machinery. And I say that with adoration. |
|
that's not a very high milestone to achieve. Even java generics are turing complete (https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.05274)