|
|
|
|
|
|
by j1elo
1987 days ago
|
|
|
> If you don't change the contents of packets, it's not NAT. Oh well, yes. I agree. I was thinking more from the point of view of the behavior it causes: essentially establishing some sort of look-up table to verify if an incoming packet corresponds to a previously outgoing one. Where, if the entry in that table gets deleted, the incoming packets suddenly start being rejected. |
|
|