Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hnews_account_1 1986 days ago
Is there a layman version of this? Something non cryptographers can grasp?
1 comments

here is a quote:

> designers of Streebog and Kuznyechik purposefully hid a structure in this component. This structure is very strong, very uncommon and interacts in a non-trivial way with the other main component of Streebog.

> In light of these results, we urge security professionals to avoid these algorithms.

It's like this: imagine some government released plans for super-secure safe, and for some reason, deep in those plans, there is an instruction to make an 1/4" hole in the door, at the specific exact position. There is no justification or explanation for this hole, just a mention that it must be present or the safe is not going to be certified.

So people wonder why it was placed on the plan. If there were a good reason, why not tell it? Perhaps NSA/FSB has some new method to crack safes, and this hole is needed for it? Better be careful, and avoid using that specific safe model.

Sorry, I should've been clearer. I was asking if there was a mathematical treatment aimed at a generally educated audience. I understand elliptic curves even if I don't fully know the ins and outs of the diffie hellman and how it is used there. So like non cryptographers but generally technical people.