| What exactly is your point, other than ad-hominem attacks? OP made no claims to know that “good” is other than > Normal, political speech is just fine. Incitement to violence, no. Struggling to see a world that would consider incitements to violence as a “good” thing. I mean sure it’s possible, but so far away from our reality as to be entirely pointless as a basis for argument. > nazi Germany, would you have the right to protest? Would you have the right to say things that are outside of the overton window? You would not have the right, and your opinions would be spat upon. What does Nazi Germany have to do with any of this? That was a government suppressing a minority population and invading Europe. Your not suggesting that AWS is about to attempt the same thing? > It is right that people with a belief strong enough to force them to action are forced to action Glad we agree that people at AWS who have a strong belief to drop Parler are allowed to act on those beliefs. > The world is unfolding as it should. Then what’s your problem? Are you saying that AWS deplatforming Parler is preventing the world from unfolding as it should? |
I'm annoyed with the histrionics. Making arguments from places of moral outrage. Of extreme emotion. Each looking at the other with righteous indignation. Unable to see that what they feel is what the other side is feeling. What is needed at a time like this is for people to step outside of themselves. To understand that they do not know everything, that there is more than one way to think and to live. To be humble. When their amygdala screams that the other is dangerous, that the other is alien and dark and inhuman... To breathe, to understand their own weaknesses and move forward from a place of humility.