|
|
|
|
|
by taylodl
1991 days ago
|
|
No. There are always a lot of discussions on HN I don't much care about - so I ignore them. Meanwhile, a historical event took place in the United Sates this past week. "Big Tech" has reacted to that event. That reaction is being discussed. Seems like an appropriate topic for HN to discuss. If you don't want to discuss that issue there are still posts such as how the new MacBook Air is the best computer I've ever used. So I suggest ignore what you don't want to read more about and click through the things you do. |
|
It's also not clear to me that HN has a compelling value-add on the "<so and so> deplatformed <so and so>" or "social media is amplifying <fringe faction>" developments vs the many other outlets covering these current events. While the current events submissions involve technology companies, they're not really stories about technology. We're discussing general-interest stories about media/service company policy that happen to involve revoking software access or broadcasting someone's message. The relevance to HN feels about the same as if e.g., a major TV outlet had been giving equal airtime to offensive parties and has now ceased doing that. HN isn't all-tech, but HN normally focuses on topics the average layman may not appreciate, and recent submissions feel much more general-interest than that spirit.
I've seen a lot of flagged/dead front-page submissions come across my RSS feed in the last week+, suggesting the HN community is pretty polarized on whether or not it wants to see some of this stuff, if something makes it to the front page and then gets killed.