|
|
|
|
|
|
by Closi
1988 days ago
|
|
|
> The United States Government decided it was fair, in many administrative and legal venues, across the country. Many Republican officials and judges affirmed it, even under intense and illegal pressure from the President and his cadre. So if the Russian government and Russian courts decide their election was fair and just, should Amazon shut down any websites which counter that viewpoint? Because that's the precedent we are presumably setting. > The severity of insurrection in US legal code is such that the military may be deployed domestically, and those service members who abetted it are guilty of an offense whose primary punishment in the UCMJ is death. Yep, same in Russia for questioning election. You get sent to gulag. Or in China - what do you mean you are talking about Taiwan being it's own independent country in a group chat? > This platform was used to coordinate an insurrection against the United States Government, and refused to act against those doing so. Most of the coordination actually happened on Facebook, not Parler. None of those arrested so far had a Parler account. |
|
|
Russia doesn't have democracy, and Amazon isn't a Russian company, so I hardly understand your analogy.
Why would you compare what Russia does to political prisoners with the military's discipline in the United States?
This may be news to you, but military service members are subject to an independent justice system with different protections, different laws, and different penalties.
You're arguing that US corporations should be restricted from taking action to suppress insurrection on the basis of having your head in the sand. The US should be in a state of emergency now, and it's obvious to me that it's solely because a white supremacist has replaced the civilian leadership of our government with those complicit in this act.
You're free to ignore what has happened, or believe in an alternate reality. Some of us would be guilty of violating our oaths were we to do the same.