Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by gruez 1985 days ago
I guses that works, but it only really prevents surreptitious password collection. If you're in a position to do active attacks (eg. MITM), you can just substitute their public key with your own.
2 comments

For sure, but it's at least possible for them to set up a honeypot to detect that.
Yeah that prevents mass surveillance but doesn't prevent targeted surveillance (think steam account with valuable skins).
The stakes are “we lost all the user passwords”. This is a problem that can occur if e.g. the POP is logging too many things. Preventing passive collection at POPs also prevents all sorts of footguns like these that can lead to a breach, it is smart security sense IMO.
You might be "only" admin of such a MITM box and can maybe only see/search the decrypted contents but not alter them.