|
|
|
|
|
by souprock
1991 days ago
|
|
Uh, so what? Letting the compiler assume that a "switch" without a default will never go there is a great optimization too. Why not put that in the standard? Actually, this is worse. Letting the loop be UB is like letting a true "if" be UB. Just never mind the code actually written; surely it doesn't mean what it says. |
|
that's actually the case already. A missing default is UB if the switch condition does not match any of the cases. And C compilers already optimize accordingly.