[ryanlol]

I think you’re completely missing the nuance in the words surrounding the authors mention of “Hanlon’s razor”.

Besides, look at Pavel Durovs flagkilled reply here. The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

[pdimitar]

That's not saying anything of substance unless you offer your own interpretation. "You're wrong" is not a discussion, it's a kick in the gut.

> The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

Solid criticism with well laid-out arguments from you, no doubt.

> Besides, look at Pavel Durovs flagkilled reply here.

Since when do upvote / downvote count mean anything at all about somebody's opinion or statements? (I haven't read the comment though.)

Look, it's obvious you have a beef with Telegram / Durov. But you are not giving any arguments, only snark. That's breaking HN's guidelines last I checked.

[ryanlol]

>I haven't read the comment though

Maybe do that. Not being snarky, you’re missing important context.

[pdimitar]

I did read it now. It's not constructive, that's a fact, but have you never got worked up by unrelenting criticism?

Still, he's an official public face and should know better. That I fully agree with.

[saagarjha]

I certainly hope that’s not the real Pavel Durov…

[pseudalopex]

Their account is 7 years old. They used to post substantive things about Telegram. Looks like him.