[hashtagread]

Is there a reason to vehemently defend people's right to threaten violence?

[jmatthews]

There is a reason to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech doesn't need protecting.

However, that's not the issue that concerns me. My issue is the conflation of TOS, applied as is expedient, on a resource that is treated in the same way as a utility.

[hashtagread]

Parler isn't publicly funded, nor does it serve a unique purpose.