[sacks2k]

Since you can't actually figure out the most obvious point ever made in a comment. The Dominion company used Solarwinds, which could have directly affected our elections after multiple companies were breached from the hack.

In Georgia, a security professional proved that machines were not only attached to the Internet, but were getting updates from servers outside the country and had the ability to be updated in real-time.

This was never investigated.

[acdha]

Those claims were dropped because they were wishful thinking and didn’t stand up to even the slightest scrutiny. The non-expert who made those claims caused the author of the tool he misinterpreted to write an entire blog post about it:

https://medium.com/@micallst/misusing-osint-to-claim-electio...

The other key thing to understand is that Georgia had a full hand recount of the paper ballots which those machines tabulated. Even if they were completely hacked, they couldn’t rewrite the paper records and there’s no credible evidence of even a single ballot being changed much less the many thousands of them which would have been needed to make the electronic and hand counts match.

[sacks2k]

A random person on a blog is not an investigation. We needed a full audit after 100s of people came out with allegations. This would have put it to rest.

There were other allegations that Dominion machines were attached to local networks for updates during election night. Were they? I have no idea. There as no investigation. Only denial.

I personally have used dead people's names (with DoB and city) in a few of the battleground states and I could see they not only received a ballot on election night, but sent it back. How could this possibly happen?

This was passed off as 'fake news'.

I'm not going to repeat all of the other claims, but we had a bigger investigation on Trumps Russian collusion, which had a fraction of the evidence.

If I could put in a handful of names into a government site and see this, I can't imagine the amount actually in these databases.

The sickest part is that people just aren't curious. They hate Trump so much, they want to win at all costs.

After so much time has passed and state leaders have rejected any and all calls for investigation (and big tech sites have censored anyone that questioned it), even if there was evidence at one point in time, it would be long gone by now. These investigations should have been immediate.

The Democrats are now going to usher in some of the worst laws imaginable for free speech. It has already started with the de-platforming of Parler.

At some point talking time will indeed be over, and it will be a time for action.

[acdha]

> I personally have used dead people's names (with DoB and city) in a few of the battleground states and I could see they not only received a ballot on election night, but sent it back. How could this possibly happen?

Who gave you the list of dead people? How did you verify its accuracy and rule out things like that case with an older woman voting as “Mrs. [dead man]”? What did reporters say when you contacted them?

> I'm not going to repeat all of the other claims, but we had a bigger investigation on Trumps Russian collusion, which had a fraction of the evidence.

That’s just silly: we have a mountain of evidence from multiple governments’ investigations into Russia’s activities and it’s had extensive hostile cross-examination. In contrast, we have a pile of unsupported allegations rife with errors and bad faith claims which the president’s own lawyers kept dropping because they knew that they didn’t have a case. That’s why Trump had to pressure people to manufacture fake votes because the real ones didn’t give the answer he wanted.

[AnimalMuppet]

Thank you. I could figure out most of that, but I resent the "I ask questions and expect you to figure it out" format, no matter who does it and what point they're pushing. And in fact you supplied some details that I did not know and would not have guessed.