Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by michaelmrose 1986 days ago
Again and again the lawsuits refused to even assert fraud and made procedural quibbles and asked that because of procedural differences the votes of millions of people cast in good faith to be thrown out until they got the right answer.

In the minority of cases that actually spoke to fraud in public filings or public statements they declined to prove it in court when given a venue.

It's not that they didn't get their day in court. They did and they had nothing to show or tell when the show and tell portion of our program came about.

1 comments

Matt Braynard's evidence was not seen in court.
https://www.ajc.com/politics/5-georgia-election-fraud-claims...

There was no evidence to present in court in the first place. If there was compelling evidence the Trump admin would have clung to it like a drowning man clinging to their savior.

There ARE tons of things good enough to meme out of context but none that stands up the the kind of scrutiny required in a court of law.

On twitter you can claim thousands of dead people voted. In court you have to actually prove it.