[hype7]

Yeah, except for the fact that there’s no one bbs “to rule them all”. The power these platforms have mean they’re up there in terms of influence of govt.

As I saw concisely said on Twitter: If you can silence a king, you are the king

[rconti]

There's nothing more absurd than calling the loudest carnival barker on the planet with virtually every form of media at his hands "silenced".

[SpicyLemonZest]

There are reasonable concerns about precedent here, but it's hard to see a reasonable perspective where this particular enforcement action is "silencing". If Trump has something he'd like people to hear, he can simply announce a press conference, and dozens of major news organizations will be ready within minutes to share his thoughts with the world.

[fapjacks]

How quickly we forget the past. Trump took to Twitter specifically because he believed none of the news organizations were reliable narrators of his messaging.

[jakelazaroff]

He believed that because to him, anything less than obsequious praise is fake. It doesn’t make it true.

[benlivengood]

Back in 2017 Trump had 3643 domains. I can only speculate that there are more now. There's no substance to the claim that he's silenced.

https://money.cnn.com/2017/02/20/technology/trump-websites/i...

[dredmorbius]

How many eyeballs spend how many minutes per day on those domains?

Exposure != delivery points.

Twitter has audience.