[anandchat]

Violate the terms, get banned. That's fair.

[st1x7]

> Who's next?

Anyone who violates Twitter's terms and conditions.

[Andrew_nenakhov]

Which can be changed by Twitter at any time.

[st1x7]

Of course. It would be weird if a company wasn't able to change its own policy.

[GordonS]

I don't think that a precedent has been set here - Trump's behaviour is unprecedented, and Twitter let him get away with a helluva lot before finally suspending him

[arentyouspecial]

Trumps free to go to parlor or some other right wing dumpster fire.

[im3w1l]

But Apple just threatened to ban Parler. If you want to play this little charade at least try to keep up.

[arentyouspecial]

What charade? I thought capitalists loved capitalism, oh except when your favorite fascist gets thrown off a stupid website.

[admiralspoo]

https://twitter.com/khamenei_ir

Funny, that account isn't banned.

[xiaodai]

Joe Biden. Yeah right.

[macinjosh]

The rest of us are next.

[lumpenprole]

First they came for the narcissistic sociopaths and I said nothing.

[esoterica]

What precedent? That a private company can ban people from posting on their servers. Well, duh.

[busymom0]

So you don't support FDA, EPA, Net Neutrality etc?

[esoterica]

What does poisoning the rivers or feeding people contaminated food have to do with banning people from Posting on a private forum.