|
|
|
|
|
by nupark2
5509 days ago
|
|
While improving the web application experience is commendable, there is still simply no replacement for the native components. Broadly speaking, investment in mobile webapps largely seems to be about improving the entrenched web developer's experience, rather than the actual user's experience. Insofar as Apple continues to invest in UI R&D, a clone of their UI's look and feel will always lack fidelity to the original, sit in the uncanny valley when approached by users, and require ongoing maintenance to track upstream changes as best as possible. Additionally, fluid scrolling on iOS devices is resource intensive and requires a very careful attention to performance details; I've yet to see HTML5 UIs scroll as smoothly as a tuned native UI. |
|
> Broadly speaking, investment in mobile webapps largely seems to be about improving the entrenched web developer's experience, rather than the actual user's experience.
While there is some truth to this, it doesn't tell the whole story. Most developers don't have the time or desire to maintain multiple native codebases, and so using web tools improves user experience by allowing the app to exist on their platform at all. Also, sometimes these things come in handy on actual websites (personally, I consider "Click here to download our mobile app!" terrible UX).