Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by yyyk 1993 days ago
>You're here citing Kissinger as a venerable authority rather than an amoral war criminal, case in point.

Citing Kissinger does not mean endorsing him.

>KSA exports the same toxic religious fundamentalism...

Iranian-supported fundamentalism controls 4 ME captials, KSA controls only 1 capital. Iran is a explicitly anti-American revisionist power with a serious nuclear program while KSA isn't.

Unsurprisingly, I focus on the bigger more toxic power (that wasn't always the case - two decades ago KSA was the bigger issue). Isn't that more like realpolitiks rather than talking about what would some fictional KSA have done?

2 comments

It sounds like you are biased, in favor of the U.S., and discounting Iranian interests.
You do realize KSA has is hands all over 9/11 right?
And KSA was indeed the bigger problem two decades ago. These days it's Iran that is sheltering Al-Qaeda people.