|
|
|
|
|
by roenxi
1993 days ago
|
|
Loans have a cost. If the banks can borrow at negative interest rates they are strictly better borrowing the money and not lending it out compared to a 0% loan. Any profitable plan with a 0% loan in it would in theory be more profitable without the loan. In econ-101 it doesn't matter what the spread is, it isn't in itself rational to lend at 0%. That is taking on risk with no gain. There must be some strange contortions in place to make this work. Whatever a "loan" is these days is going to be a totally regulatory construct with little connection to what they used to be way back when. |
|