|
|
|
|
|
by tiborsaas
1994 days ago
|
|
This is a fun one, thanks for the illustration. If you analyse 5000 board configurations you can deduce with a high certainty that there are 64 fields the pieces can be on. The pressing question is then why can some pieces move only diagonally or only in one direction or any. In the case of chess, going after the why question is pointless, but obviously that wouldn't satisfy any scientist: It works because someone decided that it should work like this. Could it work with different rules? The alien scientist then probably opt for a positive answer calling for a multiverse of chess rules :) |
|
If they could view entire matches, it seems a trivial task to acquire a complete understanding of the underlying game, no?