|
|
|
|
|
by Valectar
5512 days ago
|
|
This is a bit confusing, since a planet is defined as "a celestial body orbiting a star or stellar remnant that is massive enough to be rounded by its own gravity, is not massive enough to cause thermonuclear fusion, and has cleared its neighboring region of planetesimals.", the relevant part being "Orbiting a star or stellar remnant".
I wouldn't think it would be possible to have a freely floating planet. |
|
This points to a problem with our definition. For most people planets are anything spherical that’s too small to be a star and doesn’t orbit another one of those spherical non-stars. That’s certainly the definition this article uses.
I’m not really sure how one could be confused by that. One might be petty about it – but confused?