|
|
|
|
|
by amscanne
1994 days ago
|
|
I accept that the detection is probably possible because of the reflection, but I’m doubting the effectiveness. (The blasts would be incredibly short, and it seems like it would be hard to distinguish between severely attenuated reflections vs noise from other sources.) Re: a mesh in the windows, given that we can’t even shield microwaves, I’m seriously doubting such a weak faraday mesh would be effective. But I don’t really know what the attenuation model would be. Perhaps my assessment is overly pessimistic, but I think your assessment is overly optimistic. |
|
I disagree about the shielding of microwaves because the shielding is obviously very effective. If it weren't so, we'd feel physical discomfort with our face less than a meter from the magnetron.
For the properites of shielded windows, I refer to "Shielding Effectiveness and HPM Vulnerability of Energy-saving Windows and Window Panes"[0]. The three panes they measured range from 15 dB to 35 dB attenuation. Now scaling an attack by 15 dB is not generally easy. It may mean you have to reduce the distance and operate from a van instead of a flat for example. By 35 dB we're talking about three orders of magnitude which makes scaling impossible because it'd cook the whole neighborhood.
[0] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324950137_Shielding...