[bsder]

Huh.

Does that also hold for a "uint8_t"--which is often just a renamed unsigned char rather than being a genuine type of its own?

[Hello71]

not according to the standard, but in practice yes, currently. there are arguments that it should be considered not for optimization reasons, but there is likely too much existing code relying on it to change behavior. (see related llvm, gcc bugs)

[jart]

Yes