|
|
|
|
|
by dilatedmind
2000 days ago
|
|
my intuition is you can save cpu time when compressing before sending over the network (and certainly wall time). a quick test copying a 24M file (with similiar compression ratios) to s3 showed a 6% decrease in cpu time when piping through gzip. |
|
I wouldn't normally expect gzip to be a net savings (it's comparatively more expensive), but depending on compression ratio achieved and what layers you're passing the bytes through, I'd definitely believe it can be in some contexts.