Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by grahamburger 1998 days ago
> To achieve this though, it would require a massive investment, especially to circumvent network congestion.

AKA: 5G

1 comments

Not quite. It would require a massive investment on top of the current 5G deployment.

Replacing fiber, cable, or DSL with 5G in dense urban and suburban areas is definitely not what is currently under development.

The wireless distribution layer is really the only place mobile carriers are meaningfully bandwidth constrained. It's (relatively) easy and cheap to 10x or even 100x bandwidth available at a tower. The hard part is delivering that capacity to the end user. That's where 5G comes in.