|
|
|
|
|
|
by boomer918
2000 days ago
|
|
|
Some idiomatic suggestions seemed to replace lacking language features, which is a smell to me; I think it's best to use the language as designed instead of creating something weird and maybe even unstable like a "finally" block using the Drop trait for a dummy struct. Design patterns were weird too. The builder pattern to hide complex initialization? Not a fan; maybe it would be best to remove the complexity instead? Rust is a functional language, so OOP patterns seem like an anti-pattern. |
|
|