|
|
|
|
|
|
by friend-monoid
1999 days ago
|
|
|
Well, on the upside on the ‘for’ syntax, it allows you to say “for (objects) draw” instead of “for (object in objects) { draw(object); }”. So it’s not all bad. Edit: also, the print stuff, I feel that’s in line with the Zig Zen - make the language simple to understand. Now the print function has a very clear type. Otherwise you need a “smart” print function (like Rust does with a macro or C does with varargs). Easier to understand, not easier to type. |
|
|