|
|
|
|
|
|
by STRML
1990 days ago
|
|
|
Can confirm this; we've gotten more than 20 reports and demands for bounties for "public access" on our open data subdomain (backed by S3), which literally is `public.`. Then they beg to have the report closed as "informative". We don't comply unless it really is an honest mistake; I don't like the idea of low-quality reporters evading consequences again and again, sending scattershot bug reports in a desperate attempt to catch a team not paying attention. |
|
|