Case in point: Palantir. People would rather spread bizarre FUD they hear in the media than face the fact that they just don't know how much good Palantir does.
I got nothing against Palantir (disclosure: I'm a shareholder) but you do have to acknowledge that people have very different definitions of "good" that factor into their opinions.
Some people find that bringing technology into the government is of course good, others are vehemently against agencies like ICE or the military industrial complex.
Certainly more good than news media taking an occasional drive-by shit on them will admit. It behooves people who still read the news to develop a healthy skepticism about motivated negative coverage.
Some people find that bringing technology into the government is of course good, others are vehemently against agencies like ICE or the military industrial complex.